Tie Front Split Trouser in Stripe Navy/white stripe Forever New Low Price Fee Shipping Online Pick A Best Buy Cheap Shop FUQsB

Tie Front Split Trouser in Stripe - Navy/white stripe Forever New Low Price Fee Shipping Online Pick A Best Buy Cheap Shop FUQsB
Tie Front Split Trouser in Stripe - Navy/white stripe Forever New
Select Page

Carl Zimmer: Hello, Biologic Institute. If I make a strong claim about science in an online forum, and someone asks me for evidence for that claim, I do not say, “Well, you’ll just have to read my book.” I provide the evidence–I point to the peer-reviewed research on which I based my statement. But, hey, I’d be perfectly satisfied if you pointed me to a scientific paper that presents calculations showing that the chromosome fusion could not have happened six million years ago. I can go find it for myself–if such a paper actually exists.

Well, that was the last I heard from the Biologic Institute. They still haven’t piped back up on their own thread. However, I did hear from someone who had read the book, Paul MacBride. ( Buy Cheap Pay With Visa Visit Online Slimfit 15cm Hem Stretchdenim Jeans Saint Laurent Authentic Free Shipping Cheap Lowest Price Cheap Price iBDSYobA
.) Here’s the comment he left on Facebook:

Carl, I can tell you the answer to your question, as I have read the book. Luskin provides no evidence for this. Well, more correctly, he quotes a question from this paper http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12421751 “If the fusion occurred within the telomeric repeat arrays less than ∼6 Mya, why are the arrays at the fusion site so degenerate?” but not their three suggested answers. Luskin asserts that if a chromosomal fusion occurred it should have been a neat and tidy joining of the two chromosomes in question, anything else is a Problem For Evolution. Dave Wisker addressed this succintly in a comment at Panda’s Thumb http://pandasthumb.org/archives/2012/07/paul-mcbrides-r.html#comment-288503

That paper MacBride mentions? It’s the 2002 paper I mentioned at the start, the one that presented evidence for fusion based on a study of the human genome . In other words, the authors of this new intelligent design book cherry-pick a quote out of a paper that’s ten years old (you can check for yourself, the paper’s free). That, it seems, is all the evidence they have. If anyone tells you how impressive the science is behind intelligent design, how superior it is to evolutionary biology, may I suggest you use this example to show them how wrong they are.

I read the 2002 paper long ago, but MacBride’s link led me to reread it. I also noticed that it was cited by a number of more recent papers, including Eichler’s new one. It just goes to show how you can end up learning something new in the most unexpected places.

Update : Man, these folks will do anything to avoid just pointing me to some evidence.


Update #2: Actually, they’ll do a lot more– here’s my round up of the four days since I posted this.

Update #3: After five days, I finally got my answer. And it shows why the creationists are wrong. And thus ends this strange story.

[Image of centaur: Wikipedia]

CATEGORIZED UNDER: Evolution , The Tangled Bank , Top posts

Links to this Post

July 19, 2012 at 12:28 pm

As a long time follower of the Disco Tute and their jolly good fellows I am well-acquainted with their standard replies when called out on their invented assertions. Some of them are as follows:

0 Items


The FDA approved 27 new drugs in 2013, down from the 15-year high of 2012 with its 39 approvals. This shouldn’t be cause for alarm – 2013 numbers fall in line with the average over the last 5 years of 28 (FDA.gov).

The FDA attributes the drop to fewer applications received: 32 for 2013 vs. 41 for 2012. Of the 27 approvals, 9 were for rare diseases, and three were given the newly-established (2012) “breakthrough” designation.

Only two were large molecule drugs: Gazyva, a monoclonal antibody treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukemia marketed by Roche; and Kadcyla, an antibody-drug conjugate for the treatment of breast cancer developed by Genentech. Another approval of note was Kynamro, the first commercially-viable antisense drug approval. Kynamra was developed by ISIS Pharmaceuticals in partnership with Genzyme, and is used to treat familial hypercholesterolemia.

A complete list of 2013 approvals is available here directly from the FDA.


Breakthrough therapy designation expedites the development and review of drugs for serious or life-threatening conditions based on preliminary clinical evidence that demonstrates the drug may have substantial improvement on at least one clinically significant endpoint over available therapy. A breakthrough therapy designation conveys all of the fast track program features as well as more intensive FDA guidance on an efficient drug development program.


Both designations are intended to expedite the development and review of drugs for serious or life-threatening conditions; however there are differences in what needs to be demonstrated for each designation. To qualify for breakthrough therapy designation, the drug sponsor must provide preliminary clinical evidence indicating that the drug may demonstrate substantial improvement on a clinically significant endpoint(s) over available therapies. In contrast, a drug may qualify for fast track designation by submitting either nonclinical or clinical data that demonstrates the potential to address unmet medical need.

Tags: breakthrough therapy designation , familial hypercholesterolemia , fast track designation , , Gazyva , Genentech , Great Deals Anastasia V Neck Maxi Dress in Fuchsia size L also in MSXSXXS by the way Free Shipping From China Authentic Cheap Online Free Shipping Outlet Locations Pick A Best 5uof76b
, ISIS Pharmaceuticals , Kadcyla , Tiered Ruffle Dress in White size L also in MSXS Amanda Uprichard Free Shipping Inexpensive Free Shipping Visa Payment Cheap Sale Footlocker Finishline 8QH4mcJ
, Roche

Contact Us.

Current Month


BioBasics: Biotech for the Non-Scientist

20 sep (sep 20) 9:00 am 21 (sep 21) 4:30 pm BioBasics: Biotech for the Non-Scientist South San Francisco 9:00 am - 4:30 pm (21) 701 Gateway Boulevard, Suite 440, South San Francisco, CA 94080

Single and multiple intravenous doses of finafloxacin were considered to be safe and well tolerated by male and female subjects when it was administered at dose levels of 200 to 1,000 mg q.d. and 600 to 1,000 mg q.d. for 7 days, respectively. In comparison to oral administration ( Classic For Sale Saloni Woman Ruffled Printed Cady Mini Skirt Green Size 8 Saloni Outlet Manchester Great Sale Nicekicks For Sale U7ldJuMQx
), single intravenous doses of finafloxacin appeared to be related to a lower rate of adverse events, while there was no relevant difference for multiple doses. The previously reported increase in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels in subjects receiving multiple oral doses ( 9 ) was not confirmed for intravenous administration. Since the increases in ALT levels were observed only in healthy carriers of Helicobacter pylori , the possibility that the effect on the ALT levels was a result of the H. pylori infection cannot be excluded.

Conclusion. Despite a moderate to high interindividual variability at higher doses, exposure following intravenous administration of finafloxacin appears to be predictable. Individual elimination processes should be evaluated in more detail. Finafloxacin exhibited favorable safety and tolerability.

Womens Ruched Sleeve Blazer New Look Shopping Online For Sale Outlet 2018 New Cm3UBjl
Next Section

Trial design. This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalating trial in healthy adult male and female volunteers receiving single or multiple intravenous administrations of finafloxacin or placebo. Single doses of 200 to 1,000 mg or multiple doses of 600 to 1,000 mg finafloxacin were administered by intravenous short-term infusions (infusion duration, 1 h). In part A of the study, subjects were assigned to one of two treatment groups (groups 1 and 2). Each subject was randomized to receive two out of three single doses of finafloxacin (group 1, 200, 400, and 600 mg; group 2, 800, 1,000, and 1,200 mg) and one dose of placebo (crossover design). The initially planned dose of 1,200 mg in group 2 was not studied on the basis of intermediate pharmacokinetic results. In part B of the study, each subject participated in a single treatment period in which a daily dose was administered for 7 days (groups 3 and 4, 600 mg; group 5, 800 mg; group 6, 1,000 mg). Each subject in part B was randomized to receive finafloxacin or placebo, with eight subjects receiving finafloxacin and two receiving placebo in each treatment period. Doses were escalated on the basis of safety, tolerability, and intermediate pharmacokinetic results, with a minimum washout period of 12 days taking place between dose escalations. The trial design was adjusted if needed. All volunteers received information on the investigated drug, the conduct of the study, and potential risks and gave written informed consent. The study was conducted in accordance with guidelines on good clinical practice, the current revision of the Declaration of Helsinki, and International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) guidelines and was carried out at the Covance Clinical Research Unit in Leeds, United Kingdom. The investigation (ClinicalTrial.gov registration no. NCT01910883) was approved by the Yorkshire, United Kingdom, Independent Research Ethics Committee.

Evaluation of volunteers. Volunteers of both genders were screened not earlier than 28 days before the first administration of finafloxacin. The screening included evaluation of inclusion/exclusion criteria, physical and laboratory examinations, 12-channel electrocardiography (ECG), and inquiries about demographic and biometric data. From 24 h before the first administration to 48 h after the last administration, volunteers resided at the clinical research unit site. Poststudy examinations of the volunteers, including physical and laboratory examinations and a 12-channel ECG, were conducted 5 to 7 days after the administration of the last dose of finafloxacin. Female volunteers 50 years of age or younger were included only if they were surgically sterile or postmenopausal (defined as at least 2 years after the cessation of menses and/or a follicular stimulating hormone level of >40 mU/ml and a serum estradiol level of <110 pmol/liter).

Sampling scheme. In part A, venous blood samples for the determination of finafloxacin plasma concentrations, blood chemistry, and hematology safety parameters were drawn before dosing and at 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.17, 1.33, 1.67, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48 h after the start of the infusion. Urine was collected before dosing and in fractions of 0 to 4, 4 to 8, 8 to 12, 12 to 24, and 24 to 48 h after the start of the infusion. In part B, on day 1 blood samples were taken before dosing and at 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.17, 1.33, 1.67, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 16 h after the start of the infusion. On days 2, 4, and 6, only predosing samples were taken, and on day 7, samples were taken before dosing and at 0.33, 0.67, 1.0, 1.17, 1.33, 1.67, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, and 72 h after the start of the infusion. For part B, urine was collected on day 1 before dosing (spot sample) and in fractions of 0 to 12 and 12 to 24 h after the start of the infusion, on days 2 to 6 in fractions of 0 to 24 h after the start of the infusion, and on day 7 in fractions of 0 to 12, 12 to 24, 24 to 48, and 48 to 72 h after the start of the infusion.

Bioanalytical quantification. A liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was validated to quantify finafloxacin concentrations in plasma and urine samples. The lower limit of quantification was 5 and 100 ng/ml for plasma and urine concentration measurements, respectively (ClinicalTrials.gov registration no. NCT01910883). Inaccuracy and precision were better than 2.7% to 11.1%, respectively, for plasma samples (concentration range, 15 to 20,000 ng/ml) and 3.9% to 7.2%, respectively, for urine samples (concentration range, 300 to 90,000 ng/ml) (ClinicalTrials.gov registration no. NCT01910883).

Pharmacokinetics. The pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using standard noncompartmental procedures in WinNonlin (version 5.2) software (Pharsight Corporation, Mountain View, CA, USA) and SAS (version 8.2) software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Maximum concentrations () in plasma and the times at which was reached () were obtained directly from the concentration-time profiles. Areas under the concentration-time curves (AUC) were calculated from 0 h to 24 h after dosing (AUC) and from 0 h to the last quantifiable point (AUC) using the linear and logarithmic trapezoidal method for increasing and decreasing concentrations, respectively. Elimination rate constants were estimated by least-squares regression on the terminal portion of log-transformed concentration-time curves (λ), and the respective AUCs were extrapolated to infinity (AUC). Elimination clearance (CL), the volume of distribution at pseudoequilibrium during the terminal elimination phase (; calculated as CL/λ), the volume of distribution at steady state (), and accumulation ratios were calculated by standard approaches. The cumulative amounts of finafloxacin excreted in urine () from 0 to 48 h after dosing were calculated in part A, and from 0 h to the end of the dosing interval on day 1 and from 0 to 72 h on day 7 were calculated in part B. Average renal clearances were calculated from and the AUC of the respective time interval. To assess the dose proportionality of pharmacokinetic parameters, a statistical analysis using a power model and, if the assumption of dose linearity was discarded, an analysis of variance (ANOVA) of log-transformed dose-normalized parameters was conducted. Pharmacokinetic stationarity, i.e., the time dependence of the pharmacokinetic parameters, was evaluated using a mixed linear model approach in part B. Treatment, day, and their interaction were treated as fixed effects, and subjects were treated as random effects with respect to log-transformed AUCs, , and . Subsequently, differences between days 1 and 7 were evaluated by calculating the respective geometric least-squares means and 90% confidence intervals.

Wool trousers J666 Wool B Comfort Slim Fit dark brown Jacob Cohen Clearance Release Dates Limited Edition Cheap Price Classic Cheap Online JCvcn
leopard print stripe tailored trousers Grey Dolce amp; Gabbana Cheap Reliable Buy Cheap Footaction ptJI1f9u

This work was supported by a grant from MerLion Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Berlin, Germany, to the Covance Clinical Research Unit, Leeds, United Kingdom.




Join Our Newsletter

© 2018 AQUADECOR – protected by law Womens Double Classic Crop Jeans R13 For Nice 9TuJqhPD
– Created and Hosted by